will we say goodbye to lithium-ion batteries in later days?

June 04 [Tue], 2013, 12:08

As we all know, Lithium-ion technologies make up a large part of the proceedings because energy storage is a crucial enabling technology for clean energy systems, such as powering electric vehicles and smoothing out electricity from wind and solar generators, which is regarded much better than other types of traditional HP Mini 110 Battery. However, everything has two coins. Lithium-ion batteries remain come with a great deal of disavantages. Therefore, many technicians consider to use the Chemistry to improve the Lithium-ion batteries to ensure better performance and easier production.

Lithium-ion batteries as energy storage devices must last longer enough to provide a financial payback. How to make the batteries conserve as much as energy is the main regard on the improvement. However, Materials are the bottleneck. It's hard to find the magic material that will store a large amount of energy at low cost, will cycle for long and will not charge for long.

Quite often, when you are buying a rechargeable battery for a specific device (e.g. laptop or phone) you most likely have no choice on the chemistry used because they are not easy tasks. In general, the Lithium-ion batteries are the best option so far because they offer significant benefits for consumers than other type of chemistry in a battery like NiCd and NiMH. However, they also will be subject to aging, even when not in use; requires circuit protection; moderate discharge current. It's said that some other chemistry like boron and aluminum will be used in rechargeable batteries because they have more free energy content than the same amount of other chemistry. They promise to squeeze more energy into a given space than the lithium-ion batteries then offer a longer Compaq Laptop Battery replacement lifetime. Will they really offer a better battery for us in our future or just in theory?

As for the aluminum, the key quality of aluminum that makes it advantageous in battery chemistry is the fact that it is trivalent, having three valence electrons involved in forming valence bonds. Lithium, in contrast, has one valence electron. The result is that battery charge/discharge reactions (per formula unit) involving aluminum transfer three electrons compared with only one with lithium. In this case, it seems quite reasonable and exceeds - theoretically, at least - what is available now. However, the technicians also meet some difficulties. There are a number of obstacles that have made it tough to devise a practical aluminum-battery chemistry. For example, aluminum batteries typically use an aqueous electrolyte and consume water during their discharge cycle. They also give off hydrogen. This practise has made it impossible to come up with an aluminumbased Compaq Presario cq62 Battery that could be sealed. Therefore, the technicians are looking for the ways to overcome these difficulties.

All in all, these chemistries will give us hope to get high-end batteries with better performance in our future. Hope it can come true.